 @article {1924,
	title = {La consultation de manuscrits en ligne : une {\'e}tude qualitative aupr{\`e}s de trois cat{\'e}gories d{\textquoteright}utilisateurs potentiels},
	journal = {Bulletin des Biblioth{\`e}ques de France},
	volume = {56},
	year = {2011},
	pages = {17-23},
	abstract = {<p>Une {\'e}tude qualitative a {\'e}t{\'e} men{\'e}e dans le cadre du projet europ{\'e}en de num{\'e}risation Europeana Regia afin de d{\'e}terminer les attentes et les besoins des utilisateurs de manuscrits m{\'e}di{\'e}vaux en ligne. Des groupes de discussion ont permis d{\textquoteright}interroger s{\'e}par{\'e}ment trois cat{\'e}gories d{\textquoteright}utilisateurs potentiels, les chercheurs, les enseignants du secondaire et le grand public int{\'e}ress{\'e}. L{\textquoteright}{\'e}tude a permis de v{\'e}rifier l{\textquoteright}int{\'e}r{\^e}t des chercheurs pour ce projet, mais {\'e}galement leur haut degr{\'e} d{\textquoteright}exigence. Par rapport {\`a} l{\textquoteright}offre pr{\'e}existant sur d{\textquoteright}autres sites, leurs demandes ne portent pas tant sur l{\textquoteright}apport de fonctionnalit{\'e}s in{\'e}dites que sur la performance des outils et l{\textquoteright}exhaustivit{\'e} de l{\textquoteright}information. Chez les enseignants du secondaire, le projet est per{\c c}u comme un excellent support p{\'e}dagogique potentiel, mais il requiert des propositions de parcours. L{\textquoteright}int{\'e}r{\^e}t pour le projet est moins marqu{\'e} chez le grand public int{\'e}ress{\'e}, pour lequel la consultation de manuscrits ne pr{\'e}sente qu{\textquoteright}un int{\'e}r{\^e}t ponctuel, suscit{\'e} principalement par les enluminures. Au sein de ce public appara{\^\i}t toutefois une population de seniors, passionn{\'e}s par les diff{\'e}rentes techniques li{\'e}es {\`a} la fabrication des manuscrits, et acquis {\`a} ce type de projet.</p><p>The authors carried out a qualitative study as part of the Europeana Regia digitisation project to establish the needs and expectations of people consulting medieval manuscripts online. Discussion panels were set up for three separate categories of potential readers: researchers, secondary school teachers, and the general public. The study underlined the high level of interest among researchers, and correspondingly high expectations. They did not want new functions unavailable on websites already in operation, but rather an improvement in performance and better provision of information. Secondary school teachers thought the project had the potential to be an excellent teaching tool, but that it needed to offer access on specific themes. The general public showed less interest in the project overall, as those questioned would only ever have a passing interest in consulting such a resource, mainly for the illuminations. However, older panel members were more likely to be interested in the various techniques for making manuscripts and to endorse the project.</p>},
	url = {http://bbf.enssib.fr/consulter/bbf-2011-05-0017-003},
	author = {Laurent Bouvier-Ajam and Philippe Chevallier and Laure Rioust}
}
